Iron Workers Local 580 Insurance Fund v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Scott leads the firm’s efforts in a case alleging that Novartis improperly listed a patent with the FDA as covering Entresto, resulting in a delay of generic entry (and significantly lower prices) for a drug whose yearly sales exceed $7 billion. Litigation is ongoing.
In re GoodRx and Pharmacy Benefit Manager Antitrust Litigation
Scott was appointed to the plaintiffs’ Executive Committee and has played a key role in strategic issues and briefing in the early stages of the litigation. Litigation is ongoing.
In re JUUL Labs, Inc. Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
Member of the firm’s co-lead counsel team in litigation concerning JUUL’s marketing and sales of its e-cigarette products, with responsibility for legal strategy, briefing, and discovery for the plaintiffs’ class action claims. Class action settlement of $355 million, and total recoveries in all actions of over $2 billion.
In re Xyrem Antitrust Litigation
Member of the co-lead counsel team prosecuting claims that Jazz—the manufacturer of the prescription drug Xyrem—and would-be generic defendants unlawfully delayed the release of generic Xyrem, causing consumers, insurers, and other payors to overpay for their prescriptions by hundreds of millions of dollars. Scott played a lead role in all aspects of the litigation, including discovery strategy, briefing, class certification, pretrial work, appeal, and arguments before the Court. Total settlements of $198.5 million on the eve of trial.
In re Generic Pharmaceuticals Antitrust Litigation
A sprawling nationwide litigation alleging that many of the world’s largest drug makers conspired to prevent competition and raise prices through the pharmaceutical industry since at least 2011. Scott plays a central role in the firm’s efforts as a member of the End-Payer Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee and works on the team overseeing the expert work on behalf of the end-payors. In 2024 Scott presented arguments and expert witness testimony to the Court, which led to the Court’s certifying the bellwether cases as class actions. Settlements over $500 million with certain defendants have received final approval and litigation is ongoing against the remaining defendants.
In re Lincoln National COI Litigation
Co-lead counsel in a case challenging Lincoln National Life Insurance’s Company’s decision in 2019 to raise cost of insurance rates and premiums on policyholders for reasons not permitted under the insurance contracts. The coordinated litigation settled for $117.5 million in 2023.
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
Served as a key member of the leadership team on behalf of consumers and third-party payers who alleged that two drug companies, Endo Pharmaceuticals and Teikoku Pharma, unlawfully paid a third, Watson Pharmaceuticals, to delay the launch of less expensive generic lidocaine patches. After obtaining certification of the end-payer class and defeating defendants’ summary judgment motion, the case settled shortly before trial for $104.75 million in 2018. Scott served as the primary associate on all aspects of the litigation on behalf of the end-payer class.
In re California Gasoline Spot Market Antitrust Litigation
Key member of the co-lead counsel team in litigation alleging that gasoline traders artificially manipulated the price of gasoline throughout the state of California. Litigation resolved in 2025 through a $13.93 million settlement on behalf of the class, as well as a $50 million settlement by the California Attorney General that both the AG and the California Superior Court recognized was due in large part of the efforts of Girard Sharp and their co-counsel.
In re Restasis Antitrust Litigation
Member of the antitrust team that served as court-appointed co-lead counsel in a case alleging that Allergan used fraudulent patents and baseless petitions to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to preserve its monopoly for the drug Restasis by preventing generic versions from coming onto the market. Scott played a critical role in all aspects of the litigation and led the end-payors successful efforts to certify the class. Litigation settled for $30 million in 2022.
In re Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation, In re Solodyn Antitrust Litigation, In re Niaspan Antitrust Litigation
The firm was appointed to the Executive Committees in these “pay-for-delay” cases. Scott was responsible for overseeing discovery of the firm’s clients, including defending them at their depositions. Aggrenox and Solodyn settled for $54 million and $45 million, respectively.
Crawford v. Government of Guam
Lead the firm’s representation of native inhabitants of Guam and their families that lost their land during World War II and did not have it returned. The suit alleged that the government of Guam, which currently occupies the land, has violated the due process and equal protection clause of the United States Constitution.
In re Hyundai and Kia Fuel Economy Litigation
The firm served as liaison counsel in litigation alleging that Hyundai and Kia misrepresented the fuel economy ratings of several of their vehicles, which settled for over $200 million. Scott served as the primary associate for the firm on all matters including briefing and depositions.
In re Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation
Leads firm day-to-day work as co-lead counsel in litigation challenging Google’s monopolistic practices in the “Ad Tech Stack” – the technology platforms that advertisers use to place ads on websites and other digital spaces.